top of page
  • Writer's picturePaul Kulzer

Polyjacking vs Mudjacking

Which is Right for Your Utah Home?

If you're experiencing sinking or settling concrete around your Utah home, you may be wondering about the best method for repair. Two popular options are polyjacking and mudjacking. While both methods are effective at lifting and leveling concrete, there are some key differences to consider when deciding which one is right for your home.

Mudjacking is a process that involves drilling small holes into the concrete and then pumping a mixture of water, sand, and cement under the slab. The mixture fills any voids or gaps beneath the slab and then hardens, lifting the concrete back to its original position. This method has been around for decades and is still commonly used today.

Polyjacking, on the other hand, involves injecting a high-density polyurethane foam into small holes drilled into the concrete. The foam expands and fills any voids or gaps beneath the slab, lifting the concrete back to its original position. This method has been gaining popularity in recent years due to its effectiveness and convenience.

So, which method is right for your Utah home? Let's take a closer look at the pros and cons of each. Mudjacking Pros:

  • Lower Cost: Mudjacking is generally less expensive than polyjacking.

  • Proven Method: Mudjacking has been used for decades and has a proven track record of success.

  • Eco-Friendly: The materials used in mudjacking are natural and environmentally friendly.

Mudjacking Cons:

  • Messy: Mudjacking can be a messy process, as the mixture of water, sand, and cement can spill onto surrounding areas.

  • Heavy: The mixture used in mudjacking can add significant weight to the soil beneath the concrete, potentially causing further settling in the future.

Polyjacking Pros:

  • Lightweight: The polyurethane foam used in polyjacking is much lighter than the mixture used in mudjacking, so it won't add significant weight to the soil.

  • Fast: Polyjacking is a faster process than mudjacking, as the foam expands and hardens quickly.

  • Long-Lasting: The polyurethane foam used in polyjacking is durable and long-lasting.

Polyjacking Cons:

  • Higher Cost: Polyjacking is generally more expensive than mudjacking.

  • Newer Method: Polyjacking is a relatively new method and may not have the same track record of success as mudjacking.

Ultimately, the decision between polyjacking and mudjacking comes down to your specific situation and priorities. If cost is the most important factor, mudjacking may be the best option. If you're looking for a faster, less messy process with long-lasting results, polyjacking may be the way to go.

If you're still unsure which method is right for your Utah home, contact a professional foundation repair contractor like Superior Foundation Repair for a consultation. They can assess your situation and recommend the best course of action for your unique needs.

2 views0 comments
bottom of page